Pack Years of Smoking and Health Risks

Pack years is a measure of how much you have smoked in your life. Despite what you might assume from the name, it is not the number of years you have smoked. That's just one part of the math used to count pack years. The other part is how much you've smoked each day during that time.

Since lung cancer is directly related to the number of cigarettes smoked, doctors can use pack years to help assess someone's risk of the disease. Pack years can also help doctors evaluate the risk of other diseases caused by smoking, including heart disease, other cancers, and more.

Researchers also use pack years as a standard way to measure data in studies on smoking and disease.

This article looks at how to count pack years and what the answers may mean for you.

Lung cancer risk

Verywell / Joshua Seong

Calculating Pack Years

Two pieces of information are needed to determine someone's pack-year history:

  • The number of packages of cigarettes smoked daily (N)
  • The number of years of smoking (T)

Those numbers can be plugged into the following formula to determine pack years (PY):

N x T = PY

This table offers some examples of pack-year calculations.

 Smoking History  Formula Number of Pack Years 
 1 pack/day for 20 years  1 x 20  20
 2 packs/day for 30 years  2 x 30  60
Half a pack/day for 30 years  0.5 x 30   15

Lung Cancer Risk

The length of time you've smoked, in and of itself, may be an important factor in determining lung cancer risk.

However, the number of pack years—which takes the amount and duration you smoked into account—is more often used by health professionals to determine your risk of cancer.

In general, the more pack years you have smoked, the greater your risk of cancer. If you were looking at a graph plotting data of the two, you'd see them rise together.

Heart Disease Risk

In addition to lung cancer, the number of pack years someone has smoked is linked to heart disease as well.

Heart disease accounts for a large percentage of deaths in people who smoke, while secondhand smoke is more likely to lead to heart disease than lung cancer.

Limitations

While the number of pack years a person has smoked is a useful tool in determining risk, it is not foolproof.

For example, female smokers appear to develop lung cancer after fewer pack years than males. Some studies suggest this is because women have an increased susceptibility to carcinogens in cigarettes—a factor pack years doesn't take into account.

A 2018 study found that for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pack years might not be the best way to measure. How long they've smoked was more closely linked with COPD than the "cigarettes per day in pack-years" estimates.

The same study suggests the age someone starts smoking may play an important role as well.

Associating risk with pack years also ignores the fact that lung cancer occurs in never-smokers. In fact, lung cancer in never-smokers is among the top 10 causes of cancer deaths in the United States.

Current and Former Smokers

Current smokers are at high risk for smoking-related health issues, but they're not the only ones. Former smokers and those who smoke infrequently also have higher lifetime risks of illness.

For example, a study of heart-related illness suggests that the risk in smokers may not be tied to pack years overall. Rather, it is how much they are currently smoking that seems to matter most. Former smokers were found to have a fairly rapid drop in their risk for heart attack, stroke, and related cardiac diseases, once they quit smoking.

That's not the case for lung problems, though. One study looked at lung function in more than 25,000 people. Current smokers of just five cigarettes a day or less showed lung function decline that was five times that of former smokers. Even former smokers showed lung damage that lasted for decades.

If you quit smoking, you have a good chance of lowering your risk of cardiac diseases. That is something worth celebrating. The effort to quit is always worthwhile. That said, your risk of lung damage including cancer won't go away. Unlike heart disease, the risk of lung cancer lasts for decades after you quit smoking and never returns to normal.

One research paper looked at lung cancer in people with 30 pack years or more and found the risk was reduced only gradually for each year they were a former smoker. There was no "dramatic drop-off" after 15 years of quitting.

The same researchers went on to say that lung cancer risk in those with fewer than 30 pack years is also much higher when compared to never-smokers.

You may be eligible for lung cancer screening and should make sure you are aware of the early symptoms of lung cancer.

Recap

Pack years is a standard measure of how much you've smoked and how that smoking affects your risk of lung cancer and heart disease. It is determined by multiplying the years you've smoked by the number of cigarettes per day. Pack years matter when considering the health of both current and former smokers.

Lung Cancer Screening

Pack years of smoking is an important factor in determining who should be screened for lung cancer.

Accordingly, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends yearly screening using computerized tomography (CT) for people who:

  • Are 50 to 80 years old
  • Have a 20 pack-year history of smoking
  • Currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years
  • Are physically healthy enough to benefit from treatment should lung cancer be detected

According to the American Cancer Society, people who are screened with CT are 20% less likely to die from lung cancer than those who have chest X-rays.

The USPSTF also advises that annual screenings should be stopped if:

  • A person has gone 15 years without smoking
  • They develop a health concern that dramatically limits their life expectancy
  • They are physically unable or unwilling to undergo lung surgery if they're diagnosed with lung cancer

The American Cancer Society has slightly differing guidelines. They advise not stopping screening 15 years after quitting, but rather continuing as long as a person is healthy and able to get cancer treatment. Otherwise, their recommendations are the same as the USPSTF's.

Summary

Doctors often use pack years to estimate the risk of getting lung cancer. The formula for pack years is based on how much you smoke (cigarettes per day) times the number of years you've actively smoked.

Pack years is a useful tool for assessing lung cancer risk, and it gives doctors a standard way to describe that risk in basic terms. Yet it also misses other factors, such as differences between male and female smokers, or how early in life the smoking started.

While it will always help to quit, that won't entirely erase the risk caused by the smoking. Check with your doctor to understand what your pack years mean for you and whether you should begin lung cancer screening.

13 Sources
Verywell Health uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy.
  1. Guaraldi G, Raggi P, Gomes A, et al. Lung and heart diseases are better predicted by pack-years than by smoking status or duration of smoking cessation in HIV patients. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(12):e0143700. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143700

  2. National Cancer Institute. Pack year.

  3. American Lung Association. Health effects of secondhand smoke.

  4. Papadopoulos A, Guida F, Leffondré K, et al. Heavy smoking and lung cancer: are women at higher risk? Result of the ICARE study. Br J Cancer. 2014;110(5):1385-91. doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.821

  5. Bhatt SP, Kim Y, Harrington KF, et al. Smoking duration alone provides stronger risk estimates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease than pack-years. Thorax. 2018;73(5):414-421. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210722

  6. American Cancer Society. Lung cancer risks for non-smokers.

  7. Nance R, Delaney J, McEvoy JW, et al. Smoking intensity (pack/day) is a better measure than pack-years or smoking status for modeling cardiovascular disease outcomesJ Clin Epidemiol. 2017;81:111-119. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.09.010

  8. Oelsner EC, Balte PP, Bhatt SP, et al. Lung function decline in former smokers and low-intensity current smokers: a secondary data analysis of the NHLBI Pooled Cohorts StudyLancet Respir Med. 2020;8(1):34-44. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30276-0

  9. John Hopkins Medicine. Former smokers: what's your risk for lung cancer?

  10. Pinsky P, Zhu C, Kramer B. Lung cancer risk by years since quitting in 30+ pack year smokersJ Med Screen. 2015;22(3):151-157. doi:10.1177/0969141315579119

  11. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for lung cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statementJAMA. 2021;325(10):962–970. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.1117

  12. American Cancer Society. Who should be screened for lung cancer?

  13. Wolf AMD, Oeffinger KC, Shih TY, et al. Screening for lung cancer: 2023 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;10.3322/caac.21811. doi:10.3322/caac.21811

By Lynne Eldridge, MD
 Lynne Eldrige, MD, is a lung cancer physician, patient advocate, and award-winning author of "Avoiding Cancer One Day at a Time."